Skip to content
Edit post

Burkovsky, Zolkina: How Ukraine and the West can stop Putin’s nuclear blackmail

April 1, 2023 10:43 PM 6 min read
Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko (L) speaks with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin (R) during their meeting on the sidelines of an informal summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) at the State Russian Museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia, on Dec. 27, 2022. (Alexey Danichev/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images)
This audio is created with AI assistance

Support independent journalism in Ukraine. Join us in this fight.

Become a member Support us just once

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent.

Putin's threats to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus reflect his goal to keep Crimea after Russia's defeat in the war.

Three days after Chinese President Xi Jinping left Moscow for Beijing, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced his intention to allow the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, a satellite dictatorship involved in Russia's aggression against Ukraine.

The idea to deploy nuclear weapons in Belarus is not new – Russia has been preparing for this move since 2020.

On the one hand, it can be seen as a guarantee of control over the pseudo-legitimate Lukashenko regime. On the other hand, since the beginning of Russia's invasion of Ukraine,  Putin has used nuclear threats as an integral part of Moscow's Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) tactics to prevent early Western interference in and military aid to Ukraine.

Now, Putin is testing the international community's reaction to see whether his nuclear threats can influence the West's resolve to support Ukraine's counteroffensive and liberation of the territories Russia has occupied since 2014.

The Kremlin's goal remains the same: The Russian dictator wants to make an agreement with the West, bypassing Ukraine's key interests.

It is necessary for Putin to raise the stakes, since his army has not achieved its critical objectives on the battlefield, and his diplomacy attempts have failed to prevent the emergence of a broad anti-Russian coalition.

A year after the war started, Western arms supplies and financial support to Ukraine are only increasing. Ukraine's Armed Forces are training, arming, and preparing for a further counteroffensive.

Putin is thus trying to regain political and strategic leverage with the help of measures that might be interpreted as tangible nuclear threats. However, the promise to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus is the first, but not a major, step.

Steven Pifer: Russian nukes in Belarus - much ado about little?
Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent. In a March 25 interview, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Russia would deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus for use by the Belarusian milit…

First, the Kremlin's announcement was designed to divert international attention from the situation in Ukraine.

Putin has tried to raise the stakes many times during his rule in order to cover his failures. Today, he wants every key Western capital to consider the threat of nuclear escalation and to reevaluate assistance to Ukraine on the eve of Kyiv's counteroffensive.

Second, the Kremlin is assessing the West's response to the potential deployment of tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus. If its response is weak, Russia will deploy them in occupied Crimea with the hope that it will change the dynamics of the war and any future negotiations.

This is a point of concern for Ukraine and its Western partners.

For us Ukrainians, Russia's nuclear blackmail will not change our plans to liberate all of our territories, including Crimea. From a strategic point of view, for as long as Russian military assets remain in Crimea, stable security and peace in the Black Sea region is impossible.

However, it is unlikely that all Western partners share the same opinion.

On the one hand, official rhetoric indicates that the full restoration of Ukraine's territorial integrity within internationally recognized borders is fully supported in the West.

However, we still hear expedient "proposals" to evaluate the feasibility of complete liberation. Some of Ukraine's Western partners may succumb to Russia's manipulation of nuclear escalation amid attempts to liberate Crimea.

For this reason, Russia has already prepared its domestic legislation regarding the conditions and justifications for a nuclear strike. The Russian leadership is now preparing the necessary informational background.

Belarus Weekly: Putin threatens to place tactical nukes in Belarus
Spotlight Freedom Day - Dzen Voli March 25 marks one of the most important days in Belarusian history. On this day in 1918, the Belarusian Democratic Republic proclaimed its independence from Russia. Pahonia was adopted as the coat of arms, and the white-red-white flag became official. These sy…

In particular, back in 2020, Putin released the "Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence," which maintains that Moscow reserves the right to use nuclear weapons after "aggression against the Russian Federation with conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened." Russia created the context for this even after 2014.

Additionally, Russian authorities are at pains to convince the international community that Crimea is a "special case" – a so-called "sacred cause" for Putin.

Russia has also started to actively spread the narrative that the ongoing war is a war for the very existence of Russia as a state. This was in particular emphasized by Putin during his Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly in February.

We think that the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons to occupied Crimea will be used to communicate the same message: that Ukraine's efforts to liberate Crimea are a so-called "threat" to the mere existence of Russia, and that the return of Crimea to Ukraine cannot be considered under any circumstances.

The possibility of a situation where the West will have to respond to a tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine by Russia is one that some of Ukraine's partners want to avoid at all costs. This is why Ukraine and its Western partners must act now to prevent a dangerous Russian move in Crimea.

Russia’s annexation of Crimea
Russia invaded Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in February 2014 amid the deadliest days of the EuroMaidan Revolution that eventually ousted pro-Russian ex-President Viktor Yanukovych. While Yanukovych’s pro-Russian regime was murdering protesters in downtown Kyiv, around 30,000 Russian troops crossed i…

To do this, it is necessary to make the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons technically impossible.

In particular, Ukraine needs weapon systems with the firing range to be able to hit all of the territory in occupied Crimea. It needs to be able to destroy the military infrastructure and logistics systems for Russia's ground, air, and navy assets capable of using nuclear warheads.

There are several options on the table – short-range ballistic missiles like the U.S.-produced ATACMS or the Anglo-French Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missiles.

In terms of diplomacy, discussions about providing Ukraine with long-range missiles should be conducted precisely in this vein, as a deterrence measure aimed at effectively denying Russian nuclear blackmail. This objective should ultimately prevail over the fears and uncertainty of the West regarding the liberation of Crimea.

Last but not least, delaying this decision will not only play into the hands of Russia, but also benefit China.

As long as Russia's nuclear threats remain unrestricted, China has an opportunity to sell its "honest broker" role to the West and globally, using its UN platform as it did for decades with North Korea's (DPRK) nuclear threats.

The lesson from Chinese diplomacy regarding the DPRK shows that containment does not produce results if new technologies and money continue to flow to the dictator through loopholes. Therefore, the key U.S. and EU power should not allow China to use its recent "peace proposal" to disguise Putin's aggression and mask Russian territorial gains through open nuclear threats.

Ukraine holds back on southern counteroffensive, soldiers say
Zaporizhzhia Oblast – In a split-second, two Ukrainian jets appear over the road, releasing chaff that sets off a couple of Russian anti-aircraft missiles. It allows one of the planes to hit a Russian position that billows with black smoke rising over the trees, leaving no doubt on how close the
Before you skip this banner, we want to tell you something…

The Kyiv Independent doesn’t depend on a wealthy owner or an oligarch — in 2023, 80% of our revenue was from reader contributions . It’s thanks to them that we don’t have to rely on a single owner.

Support us now and help maintain our independent model and keep our articles free for everyone. Your contributions allow us to cover journalists’ salaries, report from the front lines, and fund projects like our War Crimes Investigations Unit.

visa masterCard americanExpress

News Feed

11:09 AM

EU Council announces 14th round of sanctions against Russia.

The new package adds 116 individuals and entities to the sanctions list, and adds a number of additional measures, including the prohibition for any EU facilities to be involved in the transshipment of Russian liquified natural gas (LNG) to any third-party countries.
Ukraine Daily
News from Ukraine in your inbox
Ukraine news
Please, enter correct email address
10:09 PM

Ukraine working on securing more air defense, Zelensky says.

President Volodymyr Zelensky, in his regular evening address on June 23, said that Ukraine is continuing to work on securing more air defense systems, and that the next weeks in June and July should be "no less productive" than May and the first half of June.
8:47 PM

No point in peace talks, General Budanov says.

Ukraine's Military Intelligence Chief Kyrylo Budanov said in an interview with the Philadelphia Inquirer published June 23 that peace talks are pointless because the only option is to reclaim occupied territory.

Editors' Picks

Enter your email to subscribe
Please, enter correct email address
* indicates required
* indicates required
* indicates required
* indicates required
* indicates required


* indicates required
* indicates required


* indicates required
* indicates required


* indicates required
Successfuly subscribed
Thank you for signing up for this newsletter. We’ve sent you a confirmation email.