News Feed

Anti-corruption detective charged with graft as conflict with security service escalates

2 min read
Anti-corruption detective charged with graft as conflict with security service escalates
The employees of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) are seen during work in an undated photograph. The protective vests they wear display the Ukrainian acronym "NABU." (facebook.com/nabu.gov.ua)

The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) on Sept. 10 charged a detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) with lying in his asset declaration.

The report comes amid an escalating conflict between the SBU, which is loyal to the President's Office, and the NABU, which is seen as more independent from the executive branch.

The NABU said on Sept. 10 it had launched an internal probe into the accusations against the employee. The suspect's name was not disclosed.

According to the SBU, a NABU detective purchased a two-room apartment in Uzhhorod in 2023 for approximately $100,000 but registered the property under the name of a fictitious owner, the mother of a close friend.

The property was not disclosed in the detective's 2023 asset declaration, and it was falsely listed as a rental in the 2024 declaration, the SBU said. However, the agency said that the woman listed as the owner had never received any rent.

The NABU said that, in the second half of 2024, its internal audit unit had conducted a background check on the detective to vet him for a new job.

The bureau examined his personal, professional, and moral conduct, as well as the records of his immediate family. Yet, third parties were not included in the review, and no evidence of false declarations was found at the time, according to the NABU.

The NABU said it would take "administrative measures provided for by internal procedures" if the SBU's claims are confirmed.

The reports follow other developments in the conflict between the NABU on the one hand and the SBU and the President's Office on the other hand.

In July the SBU, the State Investigation Bureau and the Prosecutor General's Office conducted at least 70 searches at NABU premises and charged a NABU employee with treason.

Later in the same month, President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a bill that de facto eliminated the NABU's independence. The bureau's independence was subsequently restored following large-scale protests.

The conflict continued on Sept. 2, when the NABU charged a top SBU official with illicit enrichment and lying in his asset declaration.

On Sept. 6, the SBU said it had detained Fedir Khrystenko, a fugitive pro-Russian lawmaker wanted for treason.

Khrystenko is seen as a key figure in the SBU's case targeting alleged "Russian influence" at the NABU.

Ukraine’s anti-corruption chief on how his agency became a target — and what’s next
Semen Kryvonos, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), is stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one side, there’s mounting pressure on the bureau to deliver results, especially in exposing high-level corruption — including in the secretive and ever-expanding defense sector. On the other hand, Kryvonos must constantly defend his agency from attacks — including from other law enforcement agencies, whose loyalties lie with the president’s office. Among them, the all-po
Article image
Avatar
Kateryna Hodunova

News Editor

Kateryna Hodunova is a News Editor at the Kyiv Independent. She previously worked as a sports journalist in several Ukrainian outlets and was the deputy chief editor at Suspilne Sport. Kateryna covered the 2022 Olympics in Beijing and was included in the Special Mentions list at the AIPS Sport Media Awards. She holds a bachelor's degree in political journalism from Taras Shevchenko University and a master's degree in political science from the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

Read more
News Feed
Video

Poland, NATO’s eastern frontline state, is facing its most serious security challenge in decades. Western officials have warned of the risk of a direct confrontation with Russia in the coming years, but are Poland — and NATO — truly prepared for such escalation?

Show More