CNN: US prepared 'rigorously' for potential Russian nuclear strike in Ukraine in 2022

Washington was "preparing rigorously" for a possible Russian nuclear strike in Ukraine in late 2022, which would have been the first nuclear attack in a war since the Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945 bombings, CNN reported on March 9, citing two unnamed U.S. officials.

Russia has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons in response to Western support for Ukraine, but the threats have so far failed to materialize. Russia continues to wage an all-out war in Ukraine without utilizing its nuclear arsenal.

The White House was particularly concerned Russia might use a tactical or battlefield nuclear weapon in Ukraine, the officials told CNN.

The U.S. National Security Council held a series of meetings from late summer to fall 2022 to put contingency plans in place "in the event of either a very clear indication that they were about to do something, attack with a nuclear weapon, or if they just did, how we would respond, how we would try to preempt it, or deter it," said the first administration official.

"That’s what the conflict presented us, and so we believed ­and I think it’s our right ­to prepare rigorously and do everything possible to avoid that happening."

Russia’s Medvedev threatens to nuke US, UK, Germany, Ukraine if Russia loses occupied territories

“Attempts to restore Russia’s 1991 borders will lead only to one thing - a global war with Western countries with the use of our entire strategic (nuclear) arsenal against Kyiv, Berlin, London, and Washington. And against all other beautiful historic places that have long been included in the flight…

The Kyiv IndependentAlexander Khrebet

President Joe Biden’s administration was led to such an assessment not by one indicator but by a combination of developments, analysis, and highly sensitive intelligence, CNN wrote.

The White House’s fear Russia might use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine "was not just ­hypothetical —​­ it was also based on some information that we picked up," the second official said.

"We had to plan so that we were in the best possible position in case this no‑longer unthinkable event actually took place."

One of the arguments in favor of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin's potential use of nuclear weapons at the time reportedly was Ukraine’s advance on then-occupied Kherson, which Putin claimed was a part of Russia.

The White House was worried that the loss of the city could be a "potential trigger" for Putin to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine, according to CNN.

At the same time, the Kremlin's propaganda machine was spreading a new false flag story about a "Ukrainian dirty bomb," which US officials feared could be a cover for a Russian nuclear attack, added the media outlet.

In one of the latest cases of nuclear saber-rattling, Putin claimed on Feb. 29 that there will be "tragic consequences" if NATO troops are sent to Ukraine, and the West's support for Kyiv "risks a conflict using nuclear weapons."

Putin’s threat followed French President Emmanuel Macron’s Feb. 26 statement that sending Western troops to Ukraine can not be "ruled out" in the future. The U.S. and many European NATO allies then said they were not considering deploying their troops to Ukraine.

West’s response to Macron comments on troops to Ukraine reveal discord, weakness, experts say

French President Emmanuel Macron was left on his lonesome by his fellow European allies after saying that the possibility of sending Western troops on the ground in Ukraine should not be “ruled out” in the future. Macron made the remarks on Feb. 26 at a gathering of 20 European heads

The Kyiv IndependentAlexander Khrebet