Three years of reporting, funded by our readers — become a member now and help us prepare for 2025.
Goal: 1,000 new members for our birthday. Gift a membership to your friend and help us prepare for what 2025 might bring.
Become a member Gift membership
Skip to content
Edit post

Lubomyr Luciuk: Ukraine is not new

October 17, 2022 11:54 AM 3 min read
A woman holds a Ukrainian flag in central Kyiv where damaged Russian military vehicles are displayed on Aug. 24, 2022, Ukraine's Independence Day. (Kostyantyn Chernichkin)
This audio is created with AI assistance

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent.

Ukraine is not new.

As my colleague, Professor Paul Robert Magocsi, recently demonstrated in an incisive essay, “Ukraina Redux,” Ukrainians have attempted to forge a state of their own over several centuries.

Repeatedly, Ukrainians’ struggle for independent statehood has been thwarted by predacious, indeed rapacious, neighbors. This first happened in the 17th century, then several times in the 20th.

And it’s happening again.

Despite this undeniable historical record, Ukrainians have been told they don’t exist, have never existed, and, more alarmingly, should not exist.

Nay-sayers have sometimes insisted Ukraine was nothing more than an Imperial German construct, staged during the First World War to undermine the Tsarist Russian Empire. Others claim Ukraine was Lenin’s project or maybe didn’t truly exist until Stalin crafted it in the wake of the Second World War.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has claimed he “respects” Ukrainians even as his legions deliberately target Ukraine’s civilians and infrastructure.

This is the same man who, not long ago, spouted off about how the Ukrainian state has no raison d’être as Ukrainians are nothing more than so-called misguided “Little Russians.” After delivering that epistle, Putin assigned himself the duty of dragging Ukrainians back into a supposed Russkiy Mir (obviously without much success).

And, lest this commentary seem too partial, don’t forget the many Western specialists who blathered on about how eastern Ukraine’s Russian-speaking inhabitants were allegedly Moscow-oriented, not at all patriotically Ukrainian.

Reality has demonstrated otherwise.

What many predicted would be a 100-hour war has become a Ukrainian war of independence. Those of Putin’s ilk who didn’t think Ukraine exists now know better.

Ukraine returned to its rightful place in Europe with the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991. Soon thereafter, trusting in what they believed were the guarantees of the U.S., U.K., and yes, even the Russian Federation, Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, assuming that would ensure their country’s territorial integrity and political independence.

Ukraine has since learned otherwise, the hard way. The 1994 Budapest memorandum has since proven to be a guarantee of nothing at all.

If Ukraine had retained even a few tactical nuclear weapons, Moscow’s men would not have been so arrogant in planning their genocidal war of aggression against Ukraine, and nor would Putin today be trying to bully the world by threatening Armageddon.

Meanwhile, countries like North Korea, Israel, Pakistan, India, and perhaps even Iran, have been reminded of why disarmament is unwise.

Ever since the happy day that the Soviet Union disintegrated, the “captive nations” of the USSR and Warsaw Pact have voluntarily joined the European Union and NATO.

This was not the result of some nefarious geopolitical conspiracy, nor did this growth represent any kind of existential threat to the Russian Federation. What actually happened was that the “east” came “west,” quite willingly, indeed anxiously, doing whatever necessary to escape the Kremlin.

Doubt me? Just ask a Pole or an Estonian whether they miss the “good old days” of Soviet domination. Then question a Georgian about whether their country should join NATO. The answer is yes.

This June, Ukrainians celebrated the good news that their country has been accepted as an EU candidate member. Haven’t Ukrainians’ sacrifices since then also earned them a place in NATO?

That is what President Volodymyr Zelensky said when Ukraine applied for accelerated admission. Thankfully, several NATO member countries, including Canada, Poland, and the three Baltic states, have expressed support.

As for Russian sensitivities on these issues – ignore them.

Moscow shouldn’t have a say about what Kyiv does, because Ukrainians aren’t Russians, never were, never will be, and have every right to decide their own fate.

Once in NATO, they will repay the West by continuing to defend the gates of Europe, a battle-tested bulwark blunting the designs of a rogue Russian state that will itself remain beyond the pale of civilization for years to come.

Unless, of course, the Russians have a real revolution and rid themselves of those who led them into perdition. If that ever happens, Russia might still be redeemed.

But I’m not hopeful.

Three years of reporting, funded by our readers.
Millions read the Kyiv Independent, but only one in 10,000 readers makes a financial contribution. Thanks to our community we've been able to keep our reporting free and accessible to everyone. For our third birthday, we're looking for 1,000 new members to help fund our mission and to help us prepare for what 2025 might bring.
Three years. Millions of readers. All thanks to 12,000 supporters.
It’s thanks to readers like you that we can celebrate another birthday this November. We’re looking for another 1,000 members to help fund our mission, keep our journalism accessible for all, and prepare for whatever 2025 might bring. Consider gifting a membership today or help us spread the word.
Help us get 1,000 new members!
Become a member Gift membership
visa masterCard americanExpress

News Feed

3:44 PM

Russian ICBM strike would be 'clear escalation,' EU says.

"While we're assessing the full facts, it's obvious that such (an) attack would mark yet another clear escalation from the side of (Russian President Vladimir Putin," EU foreign affairs spokesperson Peter Stano said, according to AFP.
MORE NEWS

Editors' Picks

Enter your email to subscribe
Please, enter correct email address
Subscribe
* indicates required
* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required
* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required

Subscribe

* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required
Subscribe
* indicates required
Explaining Ukraine with Kate Tsurkan
* indicates required
Successfuly subscribed
Thank you for signing up for this newsletter. We’ve sent you a confirmation email.