News Feed

Ukraine's top anti-graft prosecutor decries pressure amid reports of Security Service probe targeting him

4 min read
Ukraine's top anti-graft prosecutor decries pressure amid reports of Security Service probe targeting him
Oleksandr Klymenko, Head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), reports at a press conference on the results of work for the second half of 2024 on Feb. 10, 2025 in Kyiv, Ukraine. (Ihor Kuznietsov/Novyny LIVE/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Oleksandr Klymenko, Ukraine's chief anti-corruption prosecutor, denounced "the unprecedented pressure on anti-corruption institutions" on Oct. 6 amid reports that he is being investigated by Ukraine's Security Service (SBU).

Klymenko, head of Ukraine's Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), made the statement in a comment for the Kyiv Independent.

Ukrainian media outlet Babel reported on Oct. 6, citing its sources, that Klymenko is being investigated by the SBU in relation to a case brought against Fedir Khrystenko. Klymenko has not been officially charged yet.

Khrystenko is a Ukrainian lawmaker charged with treason for allegedly cooperating with Russian intelligence. He had been living in Dubai but was brought back to Ukraine in September.

The SBU claimed in July that Khrystenko had been in contact with National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) detectives and was influencing the bureau.

Two sources told Babel that the fugitive parliamentarian is testifying against Klymenko in a case related to three bureau employees.

The NABU employees are being investigated in a potential misconduct case after gaining employment at Ukrzaliznytsia, Ukraine’s state railway company, following their handling of cases at the railway company.

When contacted by the Kyiv Independent, Klymenko lambasted purported outside influence, accusing the SBU of overstepping its role.

"Such reports, as well as a number of clearly illegal actions against NABU employees that have already taken place, are nothing other than a continuation of pressure on anti-corruption agencies," Klymenko told the Kyiv Independent when reached for comment on the possible investigation.

Klymenko added that the reported investigation "no longer comes as a surprise" amid tension between the anti-corruption agencies and the President's Office.

"These actions and pressure are linked to a number of criminal proceedings that the NABU and SAPO are currently actively investigating," Klymenko added.

"Regardless of how events unfold, the NABU and SAPO are taking all necessary measures to prevent interference in ongoing investigations."

The SBU told the Kyiv Independent that it would not comment on "unconfirmed information from anonymous sources."

The agency added that the pre-trial investigation into former parliamentarian Khrystenko is ongoing but that additional details were not being disclosed to maintain the "confidentiality of the investigation."

Ukraine’s anti-corruption chief on how his agency became a target — and what’s next
Semen Kryvonos, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), is stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one side, there’s mounting pressure on the bureau to deliver results, especially in exposing high-level corruption — including in the secretive and ever-expanding defense sector. On the other hand, Kryvonos must constantly defend his agency from attacks — including from other law enforcement agencies, whose loyalties lie with the president’s office. Among them, the all-po
Article image

The reports follow other developments in the conflict between the SAPO and NABU on the one hand and the SBU and the President's Office on the other.

The confrontation started in July, when the Security Service and other law enforcement agencies conducted at least 70 searches at NABU premises and charged a NABU employee with treason.

The next day, President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a bill that de facto eliminated the bureau's independence. The bureau's independence was subsequently restored following large-scale street protests.

These events followed multiple instances in which top government officials, including a former deputy head of the President's Office, were targeted in anti-corruption investigations by the agencies.

Anti-corruption activists view the SBU's actions as an attempt to hinder the detectives who have previously investigated Zelensky's inner circle from performing their duties.

The SBU, which is seen as loyal to the President's Office, has presented the crackdown as a push to weed out alleged Russian influence.

Last month, NABU charged a senior SBU official — ex-cybersecurity chief Illia Vitiuk — with illicit enrichment. The Security Service called it "a revenge."

The NABU and SAPO are Ukraine's two leading anti-corruption agencies, established as part of the reforms following the 2014 EuroMaidan Revolution.

Ukraine’s Security Service and top anti-corruption agency are openly fighting. Both say only Russia can win
Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) and the country’s top anti-corruption agency are entangled in an escalating confrontation involving raids and arrests. The conflict is seen as part of a broader struggle between the President’s Office and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), which says the authorities are trying to eliminate its independence. The SBU, which is seen as loyal to the President’s Office, has arrested NABU employees, accusing them of having ties to Russia, and portrayed the c
Article image
Avatar
Dmytro Basmat

Senior News Editor

Avatar
Oleg Sukhov

Reporter

News Feed

"The Memorandum provides for the establishment of production by Ukrainian defense companies on the territory of Denmark, the creation of joint capacities, technology exchange, and the involvement of EU funding for the implementation of joint projects," Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal said.

Show More