Two years of brutal, full-scale invasion by Russia has inflicted severe environmental damage on Ukraine, impacting the country's rich biodiversity, contaminating land and water resources, and posing a direct threat to public health and safety. Addressing these challenges is crucial for the environment, but also for the long-term peace, stability, and health of the European continent.
President Volodymyr Zelensky, in his 10-point Peace Plan, has rightly highlighted the immediate protection of the environment as a precondition for a just and lasting peace. It is remarkable how committed Ukraine is to mitigating the long-term environmental impact of the war as much as possible.
A High-Level Working Group recently formulated a possible way forward in a document titled "An Environmental Compact for Ukraine." The document brings a comprehensive set of recommendations and lays out a roadmap for Ukraine's environmental recovery, highlighting the intertwined fates of ecological sustainability and regional stability. The EU has a fundamental role to play in this, and it can demonstrate its commitment to environmental stewardship and strategic geopolitical engagement by supporting Ukraine in these efforts.
Tim Mak
Next week, the European Parliament is expected to approve the long-waited 50-billion-euro ($54 billion) support mechanism for Ukraine. With proper implementation, the multi-year Ukraine Facility can serve as a model to address environmental destruction caused by war and support sustainable recovery. At its best, the Ukraine Facility can help to set Ukraine on a path to a green, net-zero economy.
Supporting Ukraine's transition to a green economy is a chance for the EU to foster innovation, green technology, and sustainable practices in a region critical to its strategic interests. Investments in renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and green infrastructure in Ukraine can serve as a model for other European countries, particularly those on the path to EU membership.
There is no doubt that the scale of the reconstruction effort will be massive. As long as the war rages on, the human and environmental costs will mount. The urgently needed support of the Ukraine Facility is expected to mostly go to providing for the immediate budgetary needs of Ukraine, such as paying for the salaries of teachers, doctors, and other essential workers. Much more international support is needed for Ukraine to recover from the war, build back better and address the vast environmental damage caused by Russia.
Accountability is a key aspect of the work of the High-Level Working Group. International law demands that Russia pay for the damages it has caused through its unlawful war of aggression. All approaches for reparation, compatible with international law, should be considered. The EU is already preparing using interests generated by the frozen assets in support of Ukraine. These funds must also be used to address environmental repair.
For far too long, the environment has been a silent victim of war. Ensuring accountability for environmental crimes is a vital aspect of the broader pursuit of justice and adherence to international law. Throughout the war, Ukraine has shown outstanding leadership in advancing accountability for environmental crimes both domestically and in international law. Last week, Ukrainian Prosecutor General Andrii Kostin announced that, for the first time under war conditions, a suspicion notice for ecocide had been published indicating five Russian officers as suspects for the deliberate shelling of a research facility containing radioactive material.
The EU's legal and diplomatic resources can significantly bolster Ukraine's efforts in this regard. By backing investigations and legal actions against those responsible for environmental damage, the EU can send a powerful message about the consequences of environmental neglect and destruction during conflicts.
David Kirichenko
The EU's support in mitigating environmental damage, seeking accountability for environmental crimes, and promoting the green recovery of Ukraine is not only a moral imperative but a strategic necessity. In the current circumstances, it is fundamental for the EU to move forward on the accession process. Following the decision to open access negotiations with Ukraine in December, the EU must now agree on the negotiating framework, which will set the guidelines and principles for the accession talks.
Support for Ukraine’s efforts in addressing the environmental consequences of the war has to be within the bigger framework of Ukraine's EU accession process. The expectation of membership and the conditionality linked to this process can help spur the necessary reforms in the country.
Aligning Ukraine’s environmental policies with EU standards will benefit both parties. Ukraine's accession can facilitate Europe’s transition to renewable energy sources if the right legislation and investments are in place.
Ukraine has considerable hydro, solar, and wind power potential. Biomass holds considerable potential thanks to Ukraine’s large agricultural sector. Moreover, Ukraine’s accession could increase domestic sourcing of critical metals and raw materials necessary for Europe’s industrial resilience and green transition.
This is a moment for the EU to reaffirm its commitment to a sustainable future, not just within its borders but across the continent, setting a global standard for environmental responsibility and resilience in the face of conflict.
Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent.
